Overview of Exploitation in the 1950s and 1960s Music Industry
During the 1950s and 1960s, the music industry was rife with exploitative practices that left many artists, particularly Black musicians in R&B, rock ‘n’ roll, and soul genres, receiving minimal compensation despite generating massive profits for labels and managers. Record companies often locked artists into unfavorable contracts with low royalty rates (frequently below 3-5% of sales), deducted unauthorized expenses like production costs, packaging, and promotion from earnings, and sometimes outright denied royalties by claiming artists owed debts. Managers took excessive cuts (up to 50% vs. the standard 15-20%), controlled publishing rights, and used mob ties or payola (bribing DJs for airplay) to boost hits while siphoning funds. Songwriting credits were stolen or shared with non-contributors to divert royalties, and covers by white artists often profited labels without benefiting originals. This era’s systemic issues stemmed from racial discrimination, lack of legal protections, and artists’ desperation for exposure, leading to lifelong financial struggles, lawsuits, and even suicides. Below, I’ll detail extensive real examples drawn from historical accounts.Common Exploitative Tactics
Broader Context and LegacyMotown, under Berry Gordy, exemplified label control: artists like The Supremes and Jackson 5 were groomed but paid minimally, with Gordy defending it as “making stars.”
Chess and Specialty targeted Black blues/R&B artists with similar tactics. Payola scandals in the late 1950s exposed bribery, but artists rarely benefited. Many fought back in the 1970s-1980s via lawsuits, but early deaths and poverty were common. This era’s practices influenced modern reforms like better royalty laws, though exploitation persists. For instance, Ruth Brown’s advocacy led to the Rhythm & Blues Foundation in 1988 to aid ripped-off artists.
- Low or No Royalties: Artists got pennies per record sold, with deductions wiping out earnings.
- Stolen Credits and Publishing: Labels/managers added themselves as co-writers or sold rights cheaply.
- Debt Claims: Labels charged artists for “advances” or costs, creating perpetual debt.
- Mob Ties and Payola: Managers like Morris Levy used organized crime connections to control profits.
- Racial Exploitation: Black artists faced worse deals, with white covers stealing market share.
|
Artist/Group
|
Era
|
Label/Manager
|
How Ripped Off
|
Outcome/Compensation Received
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ruth Brown
|
1950s
|
Atlantic Records
|
Signed in 1949; hits like “Teardrops from My Eyes” topped charts, but no royalties paid due to unauthorized deductions (packaging, remixing, artwork). Label claimed she owed $26,000 upon leaving in 1960s.
news.westernu.ca
|
Received no royalties until 1980s; fought for back pay later in life.
|
|
Muddy Waters
|
1950s-1960s
|
Chess Records
|
Blues pioneer; despite decades of hits, label’s deductions left him owing $60,000 in the 1980s, even after not working with them for 20 years.
news.westernu.ca
|
No resolution mentioned; died in 1983 still in debt.
|
|
Chuck Berry
|
1950s-1960s
|
Chess Records
|
On “Maybellene” (1955 hit), DJ Alan Freed and Russ Fratto added as co-writers, stealing royalty shares. Standard low rates exacerbated losses.
okayplayer.com
|
Fought legally for decades; awarded full credit in 1986, but lost millions earlier.
|
|
Little Richard
|
1950s
|
Specialty Records (Art Rupe)
|
Sold “Tutti Frutti” (1955) publishing rights for $50; paid <1 cent per record (vs. 3-5% standard); no royalties from Pat Boone’s cover. Sold 500,000+ copies but got only $25,000 total.
|
Sued in 1984 for $112M in unpaid royalties; settled out of court (undisclosed); rights later returned via Michael Jackson’s ATV purchase.
|
|
Big Mama Thornton
|
1950s
|
Peacock Records (for “Hound Dog”)
|
Wrote/recorded “Hound Dog” (1952, 500,000-1M copies sold); got flat $500 fee. Co-writer Johnny Otis held publishing; after Elvis’s 1956 cover hit, credits reclaimed excluding her. No royalties from covers like Janis Joplin’s “Ball and Chain.”
|
Died broke in 1984 at 57 from health issues tied to poverty.
|
|
Fred Parris (The Five Satins)
|
1950s
|
Standord/Ember Records
|
“In the Still of the Night” (1956) sold 10M copies; got only $783 total due to royalty theft and racial exploitation (white covers profited labels).
youtube.com
|
Equivalent to ~$1M today if fair; no further compensation noted.
|
|
Elvis Presley
|
1950s-1960s
|
Colonel Tom Parker (manager)
|
Parker took 50% of earnings (vs. 15-20% norm); blocked overseas tours for personal reasons, costing millions. Elvis died with modest wealth despite billions generated.
crazyonclassicrock.com
|
1980s court ruled practices unethical; Parker died in 1997 worth <$1M.
|
|
The Beatles
|
1960s
|
Dick James (publisher), Brian Epstein (manager)
|
Signed away most songwriting rights in Northern Songs for minimal pay; James took 50% on overseas sales. “Slave contract” per McCartney.
crazyonclassicrock.com
|
Catalog sold to ATV (bought by Michael Jackson in 1985 for $47.5M); McCartney sued Sony/ATV in 2017, settled 2018.
|
|
The Rolling Stones
|
1960s
|
Allen Klein (manager)
|
Klein held earnings in tax shelters, paid piecemeal; owned publishing and masters, dragged royalties. Unauthorized compilations profited him.
crazyonclassicrock.com
|
Settlements: $1.2M (1972), $1M (1975); decade-long litigation.
|
|
The Jackson 5
|
Late 1960s
|
Motown (Berry Gordy)
|
2.8% royalties (low rate); Gordy kept massive profits. Left in 1975; Motown retained group name, sued them.
|
Switched to Epic for 20% royalties; renamed “The Jacksons.”
|
|
Florence Ballard (The Supremes)
|
1960s
|
Motown
|
One-time $139,804 settlement upon 1967 exit; banned from using Supremes affiliation. Hits like “Where Did Our Love Go” generated millions for label.
|
Lost home, on welfare; died at 32 in 1976.
|
|
The Drifters
|
1950s-1960s
|
George Treadwell (manager)
|
Low salaries, burnout from tours; Treadwell owned name, fired members for raise requests. Splinter groups lost income.
crazyonclassicrock.com
|
Lawsuits over name; members quit in frustration.
|
|
Jimi Hendrix
|
1960s
|
Mike Jeffery (manager)
|
Funneled cash offshore; high studio costs left Hendrix unpaid despite hits like “Purple Haze.” Died broke.
crazyonclassicrock.com
|
Family threatened 2006 suit over $15M rights sale; no resolution.
|
|
Badfinger
|
Late 1960s
|
Stan Polley (manager)
|
Polley pocketed all earnings (e.g., $75k while band got thousands); restrictive contracts, vanished advances.
crazyonclassicrock.com
|
Suicides of Pete Ham (1975) and Tom Evans (1983) over lost royalties; $5M lawsuit.
|
|
Lester Chambers (The Chambers Brothers)
|
1960s
|
Columbia Records
|
No royalties for 27 years (1967-1994) on hits like “Time Has Come Today”; lived on $1,200/month from odd jobs.
crazyonclassicrock.com
|
Relied on donations; housing/medical aid from funds.
|
faroutmagazine.co.uk
news.westernu.ca
27 web pages
59 results
Motown’s Exploitative Practices in the 1950s-1960s
Motown Records, founded by Berry Gordy in 1959, revolutionized soul and pop music but was notorious for exploitative contracts that mirrored (and sometimes exceeded) industry norms of the era. As a Black-owned label, it provided opportunities for African American artists amid racial barriers, yet Gordy ran it like an assembly line: strict control over image, production, and finances. Artists signed long-term deals with low royalties (typically 2-3% of sales, often divided among group members), high deductions for costs, and obligatory use of Gordy’s Jobete publishing company, which captured songwriting royalties. Minors received meager allowances while earnings were held “in trust.” Relentless touring supplemented income, but many left broke, leading to lawsuits in later decades. Gordy defended this as building stars from “kids off the street,” but critics called it ruthless profiteering.Common tactics:
Motown’s model built icons but at great personal cost—many artists faced poverty, addiction, or early deaths post-departure. Lawsuits in the 1980s-1990s recovered some funds, highlighting systemic issues. Gordy’s empire sold for millions in 1988, while early stars often got pennies. This era’s practices spurred industry reforms, though debates persist on balancing risk-taking labels vs. fair artist pay.
- Low royalties: 2.7-2.8% standard, withheld for taxes/contingencies or recouped costs.
- Publishing control: Artists forced into Jobete, diverting writer credits/earnings to Gordy.
- Favoritism and demotion: Best material/solos went to preferred acts (e.g., Diana Ross), sidelining others.
- Exit restrictions: Departing artists sued or barred from using group names; settlements often paltry.
- Minor contracts: Exploited youth/inexperience; some voided later.
|
Artist/Group
|
Details of Exploitation
|
Outcome/Compensation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jackson 5
|
Signed as minors; 2.8% royalties (split among members/brothers); small weekly allowances ($10-20 in 1960s equivalent); Gordy retained massive profits from hits like “I Want You Back.” Joe Jackson pushed departure due to low pay.
|
Left in 1975 for Epic (20% royalties); Motown retained name, sued them; renamed “The Jacksons.”
|
|
Florence Ballard (The Supremes)
|
Founding member; demoted from lead vocals as Gordy favored Diana Ross; fired in 1967 amid depression/alcohol issues (ignored pleas for help). Settlement barred her from using “Supremes” name.
|
One-time ~$139,000 payment (much stolen by lawyer); died broke at 32 in 1976 on welfare.
|
|
Martha Reeves & the Vandellas
|
Low royalties; hits like “Dancing in the Street” generated millions for label but minimal for artists. Reeves stunned by Motown’s LA move without notice; fought release from contract.
|
1989 lawsuit (with original members) for unpaid royalties since 1972; settled 1991 (terms undisclosed); separate 1983 win for back/future royalties.
|
|
Mary Wells
|
Signed at 17; hits like “My Guy” (#1); still on minor’s contract with low royalties. Sued arguing contract invalid as minor.
|
Won release 1964; settled; signed lucrative 20th Century Fox deal but career declined (alleged Motown interference).
|
|
Stevie Wonder
|
Signed at 11; earnings held in trust; small allowances despite early hits.
|
Renegotiated better terms later (1970s control/artistic freedom); one of few to thrive long-term at Motown.
|
|
Holland-Dozier-Holland (Songwriters/Producers)
|
Wrote Supremes/Four Tops hits; disputed royalties/profits sharing.
|
Left 1968 amid lawsuit; formed Invictus/Hot Wax; used pseudonyms initially due to restrictions.
|
59 web pages
Stax Records exploitation
10 results
10 web pages
Stax Records exploitation
64 results
Stax Records and Artist Exploitation (1950s-1970s)
Stax Records, founded in 1957 as Satellite Records by Jim Stewart and his sister Estelle Axton (renamed Stax in 1961), was a groundbreaking Memphis-based soul label known for its integrated environment and raw “Memphis Sound.” Unlike Motown’s polished assembly-line approach, Stax fostered a family-like atmosphere with an interracial house band (Booker T. & the M.G.’s) and staff, producing classics for Otis Redding, Isaac Hayes, Sam & Dave, Carla Thomas, and others. Co-founders Stewart (white) and later Al Bell (Black executive promoted in 1965) emphasized equality amid racial tensions, creating a haven in segregated Memphis.However, Stax faced systemic exploitation issues common to the era, though less overtly ruthless than labels like Motown or Chess. Problems stemmed from poor contracts, opaque accounting, financial mismanagement, and the 1975 bankruptcy, leaving many artists underpaid or unpaid. Key factors:
Broader ContextStax was praised for racial integration and artist development (e.g., open-door policy via Satellite Record Shop), contrasting harsher labels. Jim Stewart and Al Bell focused on music over exploitation, but business naivety (e.g., unread contracts) and 1970s overexpansion caused fallout. Bankruptcy left artists without back royalties; many (like Hayes) sued or left broke temporarily. Legacy: Stax produced timeless soul but highlighted industry risks for independent labels and Black artists. Modern reissues (via Concord) have helped estates, but early losses persist.
- Atlantic Distribution Disaster (1968): Jim Stewart signed a 1965 deal without reading it fully, granting Atlantic ownership of all pre-1968 masters. When Atlantic was sold to Warner Bros., Stax lost its entire early catalog (including most Otis Redding hits), devastating revenue streams.
- Financial Troubles and Bankruptcy: Overexpansion, bad distribution deals (e.g., with CBS in 1972), bank loans, and lawsuits led to involuntary bankruptcy in 1975. Masters were sold cheaply to Fantasy Records (now Concord).
- Royalties and Accounting: Deductions and debts left artists owing money; late-era non-payments sparked disputes.
- Artist Treatment: Generally positive—seen as fairer and more collaborative—but financial chaos hurt payouts.
|
Artist/Group
|
Details of Exploitation/Impact
|
Outcome/Compensation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Otis Redding
|
Stax’s biggest star; died 1967 in plane crash. Post-death, Atlantic retained pre-1968 masters (most hits like “(Sittin’ On) the Dock of the Bay”). Estate lost ongoing control/revenue from early catalog.
|
Family (wife Zelma) managed estate successfully; worth ~$10M at death (equivalent ~$90M today via royalties, licensing). No direct Stax rip-off claims, but catalog loss affected legacy earnings.
|
|
Isaac Hayes
|
Staff songwriter turned star; hits like Hot Buttered Soul (1969) and “Theme from Shaft” (1971). Stax defaulted on royalties amid 1970s debts; sued for $5.3M in 1974.
|
Released from contract; later filed personal bankruptcy (1976, debts >$6M tied to Stax loans). Recovered career elsewhere (ABC/Polydor).
|
|
Carla Thomas
|
Early star (“Gee Whiz”); opaque accounting left her owing Stax ~$80,000 by 1986 despite hits.
|
Minimal recovery noted; part of broader industry underpayment for Black artists.
|
|
Sam & Dave
|
Signed to Atlantic, “loaned” to Stax; produced hits with Hayes/Porter and M.G.’s. 1968 Atlantic split forced return to Atlantic—no access to Stax team, quality dipped.
|
Career declined post-split; no major Stax-specific royalty disputes, but lost momentum and earnings potential.
|
|
Booker T. & the M.G.’s
|
House band; salaried employees with production pool (royalty share). Backed most sessions but no widespread complaints of low pay—benefited from hits like “Green Onions.”
|
Steady work; members (e.g., Steve Cropper) thrived individually. Less impacted than vocal artists.
|
64 web pages
58 results
Motown Artist Exploitation: Practices and Examples
58 web pages
41 results
Motown Artist Exploitation: Overview
Motown Records, founded by Berry Gordy in 1959, became a powerhouse in the 1960s soul and pop scene, launching stars like The Supremes, Marvin Gaye, and The Jackson 5. However, behind its success lay widespread exploitation, particularly of young, often Black artists during the label’s Detroit heyday (1959-1972). Gordy ran Motown like a factory—controlling every aspect from music production to personal lives—while imposing contracts that favored the label. Artists faced low royalties (typically 2.7% of sales, split among groups), massive deductions for expenses (recording, travel, “damaged” records), charges for unreleased material, and obligatory publishing through Gordy’s Jobete company, which siphoned songwriting earnings.
Minors received meager allowances ($10-20 weekly), with earnings “held in trust” but rarely disbursed fully.
Gordy defended these practices in a 1995 interview, arguing “exploitation is not necessarily bad” as it turned unknowns into stars.
Critics, including former artists, highlighted racial and economic inequities, with many ending up in poverty despite generating millions.
The label’s move to Los Angeles in 1972 exacerbated issues, leaving behind artists who felt abandoned.
Common Exploitation Tactics
Broader Impact and LegacyBy the late 1960s, exploitation led to a talent exodus, weakening Motown amid competition and civil rights shifts.
Lawsuits in the 1970s-1980s recovered some royalties (e.g., Martha Reeves in 1989), but many artists suffered lifelong poverty, addiction, or early deaths.
Gordy sold Motown for $61M in 1988, profiting immensely.
This era exposed music industry inequities, influencing modern reforms like fairer contracts, though debates on Gordy’s role—as visionary or exploiter—persist.
english.elpais.com
soulbot.uk
- Financial Control: Artists borrowed from Motown (with interest) for basics; charged for all costs, including unreleased sessions (e.g., multiple versions of songs recorded, only one released).
- Royalty Theft: Low rates, deductions for taxes/contingencies; publishing locked to Jobete, benefiting Gordy.
soulbot.uk
- Personal Oversight: Strict rules (e.g., segregated tour buses to prevent “influence”); favoritism toward acts like Diana Ross.
soulbot.uk
- Name Ownership: Departing artists couldn’t use group names (e.g., Jackson 5 became The Jacksons).
english.elpais.com
- Underpayment of Staff: Session musicians (Funk Brothers) paid $5-10 per track vs. $50 standard, with little credit.
soulbot.uk
|
Artist/Group
|
Exploitation Details
|
Outcomes/Consequences
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Jackson 5
|
Signed as minors; 2.7% royalties split; small allowances; billed for 469 recordings (only 174 released); name owned by Motown.
|
Departed 1975 for Epic (higher 20% royalties); renamed The Jacksons; faced lawsuit over name.
|
|
Florence Ballard (The Supremes)
|
Demoted from lead; forced out amid favoritism to Diana Ross; low pay led to destitution post-1967 firing; alcohol issues exacerbated by mistreatment.
|
Paltry $139k settlement; banned from Supremes affiliation; died broke at 32 in 1976 from heart attack.
|
|
Marvin Gaye
|
Contentious with Gordy (brother-in-law via marriage to Anna Gordy); career stifled (e.g., resisted pop formula for socially conscious work like What’s Going On); low royalties amid hits; personal conflicts including abuse allegations.
|
Left Motown 1981; financial disputes contributed to drug issues; murdered by father in 1984.
|
|
Mary Wells
|
Signed at 17; hits like “My Guy” but minor contract meant low royalties; argued contract invalid.
|
Won release 1964; signed 20th Century Fox for better deal, but career faded; no major lawsuits noted.
|
|
Stevie Wonder
|
Signed at 11; earnings withheld in “trust”; small allowances despite early success.
english.elpais.com
|
Renegotiated 1970s for control; one of few to thrive long-term at Motown.
|
|
Holland-Dozier-Holland (Songwriters/Producers)
|
Unpaid royalties on hits; Gordy reneged on stock promises; forced to pay 25% production costs.
|
Left 1968; formed Invictus/Hot Wax; sued over restrictions but succeeded independently.
|
|
Frances Nero
|
Won talent contest for contract; single poorly promoted (10k copies); no royalties; pressure to comply.
soulbot.uk
|
Left after stalled renewal; highlighted female artists’ similar experiences.
|
|
The Marvelettes
|
Low pay; left destitute after Motown’s LA move; hits like “Please Mr. Postman” profited label more.
soulbot.uk
|
Group dissolved; members faced poverty.
|
|
Funk Brothers (Session Musicians)
|
Paid $5-10 per session (vs. $50 norm); no credits; moonlighting banned.
soulbot.uk
|
Gained recognition later via documentaries; many died poor.
|
soulbot.uk
soulbot.uk
42 web pages 57 results
Legal Reforms Addressing Music Industry Exploitation Post-1960s
The exploitative practices exposed at labels like Motown in the 1960s-1970s—low royalties, unfavorable contracts, and lack of artist control—spurred gradual reforms. Advocacy from artists like Ruth Brown highlighted systemic issues, leading to industry settlements, nonprofit support, and federal copyright changes. While no single law directly targeted “Motown-style” exploitation, key developments improved royalty payments, contract fairness, and protections for legacy artists (especially pre-1972 recordings common in the Motown era).Key Reforms and Their Impacts
Broader Legacy and Ongoing Issues
|
Reform/Law
|
Year
|
Description
|
Impact on Artist Exploitation
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sound Recording Amendment
|
1971 (effective 1972)
|
First federal copyright protection for sound recordings (post-Feb. 15, 1972); anti-piracy focus but established basis for performer royalties in digital era.
|
Pre-1972 recordings (most Motown classics) lacked federal royalties from digital uses until later fixes; post-1972 works gained stronger protections against unauthorized duplication.
|
|
Copyright Act of 1976 (Section 203)
|
1978 (effective)
|
Introduced termination rights: Artists/authors can terminate grants of copyright after 35 years (for post-1978 works), reclaiming control.
|
Allows renegotiation or reclamation of rights sold cheaply in early careers; ongoing battles (e.g., against labels claiming “work-for-hire”) but empowers artists like those from 1970s onward.
|
|
Rhythm & Blues Foundation
|
Founded 1988
|
Nonprofit sparked by Ruth Brown’s royalty fight with Atlantic; funded by settlements/donations (e.g., Atlantic $1.5M, Motown/Universal funds). Provides grants, medical aid, and Pioneer Awards.
|
Direct aid to 1940s-1970s R&B/Motown-era artists (hundreds assisted); pressured labels to retroactively pay royalties and set industry standards for legacy support.
|
|
Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act
|
1995
|
Created limited public performance royalties for digital transmissions (e.g., satellite/web radio) via SoundExchange.
|
Artists/labels get paid for digital plays (45% to featured artists); pre-1972 gap persisted until 2018.
|
|
California Labor Code §2855 (“Seven-Year Rule”)
|
Enacted 1872; key post-1960s application
|
Limits personal services contracts (e.g., recording deals) to 7 years enforcement.
|
Prevents perpetual bondage; artists can leave after 7 years (e.g., influenced departures from restrictive deals).
|
|
Coogan Law Updates (California Child Actor’s Bill)
|
Original 1939; entertainment expansions post-1970s
|
Requires 15% of minor’s earnings in trust; court approval for contracts; work hour/education limits.
|
Protected young Motown signees (e.g., Jackson 5, Stevie Wonder) retroactively/influenced better minor deals industry-wide.
|
|
Orrin G. Hatch–Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act (MMA)
|
2018
|
Federalized pre-1972 recordings; digital services pay royalties for them; created Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) for streamlined mechanicals; producers/engineers get shares.
|
Closed loophole harming Motown/Jazz/Blues icons; ensures streaming royalties for pre-1972 works, benefiting estates of exploited 1960s artists.
|
- Industry Settlements: 1980s-1990s saw labels (Atlantic, MCA/Universal) waive debts, pay back royalties, and fund foundations due to public pressure.
- Artist Empowerment: Higher baseline royalties, transparency demands, and unions/advocacy grew; modern contracts often include audits and fairer splits.
- Gaps Remain: Pre-MMA, pre-1972 artists got no federal digital royalties; termination fights continue (labels argue “work-for-hire”). Exploitation persists in new forms (e.g., streaming low payouts), but these reforms provided tools for recourse, directly aiding survivors/estates of the Motown era
- 57 web pages
Explain Copyright Termination Rights
What Are Copyright Termination Rights?
Copyright Termination Rights are a unique U.S. legal mechanism that allows authors (or their heirs) to reclaim ownership of copyrights they previously transferred or licensed to others (e.g., record labels, publishers, film studios) after a certain period. These rights were designed to protect creators from unfair, one-sided deals—often signed early in their careers when they had little bargaining power—by giving them a “second bite at the apple” later when the work’s value is proven.They stem from the recognition that creators should benefit from the long-term success of their work, countering perpetual exploitation common in industries like music and publishing.Two Main Categories of Termination RightsU.S. copyright law provides two separate termination windows, depending on when the copyright transfer occurred:
How Termination Works (Process)
|
Category
|
Applies To
|
Termination Window
|
Key Details
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Section 304(c) Termination (Pre-1978 Works)
|
Works copyrighted before January 1, 1978 (most 1950s-1970s music, including early Motown, Stax, etc.)
|
56 years after the copyright was originally secured (or after 1978 renewal, if applicable)
|
Originally for the 19-year renewal term under the 1909 Copyright Act. Extended by the 1976 Act and 1998 Sonny Bono Act to cover the full extended term (up to 95 years from publication). Heirs can terminate grants made by the author.
|
|
Section 203 Termination (Post-1978 Works)
|
Works copyrighted on or after January 1, 1978 (transfers executed by the author after that date)
|
35 years after the date of the grant (or 35-40 years if publication rights were included)
|
Applies to new grants. A narrower window than Section 304. Cannot terminate “works made for hire.”
|
- Eligibility: The right is inalienable—cannot be waived or contracted away.
- Who Can Exercise:
- The living author(s).
- If deceased: Surviving spouse (50%), children/grandchildren (split remaining 50%).
- Notice: Must serve written notice on the grantee (label/publisher) 2-10 years before the effective termination date.
- Effective Date: Termination takes effect on the specified date; old grant ends, rights revert to author/heirs.
- New Deals: After termination, creators can renegotiate better terms, license directly, or sell anew (but foreign rights and derivatives may have exceptions).
- Pre-1978 Recordings: Masters were often treated as “works for hire,” blocking termination—but publishing (songwriting) rights can often be terminated under Section 304.
- Key Wave: The 35-year window for early 1980s grants began hitting around 2013-2020s; pre-1978 publishing terminations started in the 2010s (e.g., 56 years from 1950s-1960s copyrights).
- High-Profile Cases:
- Victor Willis (Village People “Y.M.C.A.”) successfully terminated in 2013.
- Ongoing fights: Duran Duran, Paul McCartney, and heirs of artists like Ray Charles.
- Labels often argue “work for hire” to block terminations.
- Works Made for Hire: No termination possible (common label argument for masters).
- Derivatives: Old grantee keeps rights to existing derivatives (e.g., remixes, films using the song).
- International: U.S.-only; foreign rights unaffected.
- Litigation: Labels frequently challenge notices, leading to costly lawsuits.
Hi, this is a comment.
To get started with moderating, editing, and deleting comments, please visit the Comments screen in the dashboard.
Commenter avatars come from Gravatar.